STATEMENT OF THE CASE PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Defendant/Appellant Janos Dohanics was issued a citation for an alleged violation on October 11, 1996, under 75 Pa. C.S.A. s.3362 (a) (1). On November 21, 1996, defendant was convicted of violating 75 Pa C.S.A. s.3362(a) (1) regarding maximum speed limit, by District Justice William Wagner, at docket number TR 3760-96. On January 27, 1997, defendant was convicted at a trial de novo before Judge Warren Watson for the offense of exceeding the 35 MPH speed limit of an urban district, at docket number 2378 CL 96. FACTUAL BACKGROUND At trial before Common Pleas Judge Watson, the citing officer presented testimony of distance between pavement markings and elapsed time, as listed on the traffic citation. The officer testified that his VASCAR Plus electronic device indicated defendant's speed as 66 MPH. The defendant presented a witness who rebutted the officer's testimony by showing that the speed and distance parameters on the traffic citation indicated defendant's speed to be very nearly 44 MPH. The trial court accepted the testimony of defendant's witness and adjudged defendant guilty. Defendant/Apellant appealed to Superior Court. 3 Appeal: Page 4 |
Member of the
Internet Link Exchange
Web publishing by 3D RESEARCH
Please report problems to web@3dresearch.com